Howdy from the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. I am honored to be a contributor to ELL Connect to share my experiences teaching speakers of Appalachian English (AE). The middle school where I teach is nestled in a mountain community, and the families of the students I serve have lived in the area for generations. Perhaps it seems strange that I am writing about a group of English speakers who have been in this country for generations on a blog focused on English learners; however, ELs and dialectal speakers share a common issue: how to hold to their heritage language while using Standard English. Both Dolores Perez and Robert Rivera-Amezola have written about the importance of a student’s heritage language in previous blog posts, and this is true not only for ELs but for dialectal English speakers as well.
Rural Appalachians are an “invisible minority” whose language and culture is often considered inferior to mainstream language and culture. This linguistic prejudice is revealed in jokes about “rednecks” and is portrayed in sitcoms and advertisements that create the perception that AE speakers are not intelligent because of their speech patterns. Of course, this is not the case, but due to the emphasis on standardized testing in our public schools, AE speakers are given subtle and not-so-subtle messages that their speech patterns are inferior to Standard English.
In a previous blog post, Rebeca Garcia-Gonzalez urged teachers of ELs to be prepared to advocate for their students as Common Core standards are adopted This is also true for teachers of students who speak non-standard dialectal English. The Appalachian region of the United States includes Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Virginia. Out of those 13 states, all have adopted Common Core standards except for Virginia, but Virginia’s newly revised English College and Career Readiness Standards are based largely on the Common Core.
This is significant because the Common Core Standards imply that key features of AE are, in fact, errors in writing according to the Common Core Language Progressive Skills Chart . When an AE speaker writes We was mudboggin’, she would not meet standard L.5.1d. Recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in verb tense. Noncord of subjects and verbs is a feature of AE; for example: In the country, some things that you can do is ride; it be peaceful; you want be disturb. Appalachian English has a rhythmic, melodic quality and students’ use of this language ties them to their mountain heritage.
But imagine how inferior an AE speaker might feel when working through this Common Core Standard: L.6.1e. Recognize variations from Standard English in their own and others’ writing and speaking, and identify and use strategies to improve expression in conventional language. I key in on improve expression in conventional language and believe the phrasing of that standard implies that non-standard dialect is inferior and should therefore be improved. This is one of the not-so-subtle messages that an AE speaker must give up their heritage language in order to be successful in school. Perhaps the standard is encouraging teaching code switching, which is an excellent strategy for students to learn to go between their home language and Standard English; however, my hunch is that as states create curriculum to correspond to the Common Core Standards, the emphasis will be on using “correct” English, rather than on teaching code switching.
I look forward to sharing my thoughts on how dialectal speakers are experiencing school in this time of high-stakes testing and changing standards, and I welcome your insights and discussion.
If you liked my post, you might want to join ELL Connect, a public community of educators interested in advocacy for English Language Learners. Click on the My Communities tab to join ELL Connect

Comments
Hi Michelle,
Codeswitching is an important skill to have for college readiness, but this debate has not always been part of teacher preparation or part of district-adopted curricula. The result is that many educators, even experienced ones, are not aware that our views on linguistic diversity are evolving. In his dissertation, David West Brown makes a case for a "linguistically informed curriculum" and concludes
In other words, we are transitioning from a "learn to correct your language" view to a view that prizes the skill of switching between and preserving dialect and standard varieties. Not only has this transition not caught up with our current assessment trends, the struggle is far from over.
A majority of states has adopted the CCSS, but it remains to be seen how each state will help its teachers incorporate them into their teaching. Like I've said before, teacher voices and teacher leadership are the two most important parts of this move. I am certain that codeswitching (as described by West Brown) will eventually become part of the curriculum if more of us insist on it.
I am not sure why the Virginia DOE's website presents the English Standards of Learning as compared with the CCSS, since the common core standards are not content standards. But the same site shows that the Virginia College and Career Readiness Performance Expectations closely correlate with the CCSS. This is good because teachers in your state will not have to plan with anything radically different from what they've been using. I wonder if the the VCCRPE or the VESL present the issue of language diversity in a more positive light. If so, this is something that teachers can bring up in conversations with their school districts.
If not, then a new opportunity arises as writing projects seize the chance to become professional development contributors in the integration of the CCSS. A "linguistically aware" approach to planning with the CCSS and the ELA content standards will sound like an attractive proposition if it can also show it improves student performance.
Thanks for this posting. I agree that the battle for "difference, not deficit" is far from over, whether the difference is language or dialect. In Tennessee's new teacher evaluation system, the ability to use "correct" language is one aspect of our overall rating.